Sunday, September 19, 2010

Ronald W. Walters, a political activists for African-Americans, wrote a book called Black Presidential Politics in America: A Strategic Approach. In this book he makes the case that Blacks in America have a substantial effect in presidential elections. For example, he points out that the Black vote had provided the victory for president Carter. Walters also shows that Blacks have a great potential to influence the House of Representatives. He also presents ways to further increase the amount of power Blacks have in the political process.

In his book, Walters often talks about two reoccurring political strategies used by Black Elected Officials (BEOs) and groups focused upon African-American issues: Dependent-Leverage and Independent Leverage. The Former strategy is the attempt to influence the political atmosphere by gaining access to an existing party and changing the party platform. Logically, if Blacks were to lend their support to a party, said party would be more than willing to listen to the needs and desires of the Black community. In most of the cases written about in the book, it is the Democratic party that was the beneficiary of the Black vote.

This stradegy, while providing some great and much needed advantages, was not without fault. The Black vote was in danger of being a guarantee for the Democratic party. As such, less effort was put into appealing to the Black community. The shift to more conservative practices had also impeded the prevalence of Black issues in politics.

Independent-Leverage, on the other hand, seeks to become relevant by rewarding or punishing candidates as necessary. Instead of unwavering support of the Democratic Party, blacks would have a more neutral position between the parties. This would force the Democrates to make an effort to win the Black vote, and Republicans would see that Blacks are not only a potential swing-vote, but are also viable constituents rather than certain opponents.

Walters himself favors the second strategy as the former has not proven to be very effective in making African-American issues be taken seriously. The later, on the other hand, brings the community's voice to the forfront and allows for BEOs to become powerful leaders in the community and in higher offices.

1 comment:

  1. Dr. Traylor was very aggressive with her approach on giving us a lecture upon the high expectation of Howard University and full awareness of the legacy that follows in Howard University's background yet I found her approach to be to harsh. I didnt respect the disrespectfulness of that weeks class so I see why she may have been so strong. I feel as though I did not take all that I should have from the lecture after all I showed up late because I was in no mood for another lecture. I feel as though I did not prepare myself well and give her all the attention I deserved so I could learn more about Howard and understand that there is more to it than being number 1. I need to do my research on Howard because when I think about it my reason for being here is not valid enough with all the talent that has been threw these halls. One word i will take is dumbasserfaction..not sure if i spelled it wrong but to me I took it as it was fully directed toward me because I lack the knowledge I should have. That week I didnt learn much but I did learn I had to take a huge step toward gaining knowledge. Im far from it.
    Charderah Patterson

    ReplyDelete